In fact they have a vested interest to challenge that suggestion. user.Īt one time or another various Australian bodies have "authoritatively" declared that Pom and Pommie are not racist terms including Cricket Australia and Australian Television watchdogs but these bodies have no legal right to do so. Like any other racist or semi-racist terms It is not just the definition of the word itself, (although, noticeably, other derogatory terms such as Kraut, Chink, Frog, Jock, and Wog were removed from both countries' vernacular long ago) but the context in which the words are used and the intent of the abuser. Both countries (mainly Australia) had dubious racism reputations during the 60s, 70s and 80s, and most older English immigrants now clearly understand that they were certainly subjected to racial abuse.
That would today be called 'hate speech' and if used to in a physical confrontation would be 'direct racism' or racial abuse that would involve a police prosecution.Īustralians and New Zealanders try hard to convince the gullible that these are actually terms of endearment by inventing various definitions of the word 'Pom' in an attempt to persuade everyone that it is in no way racist. In fact these terms were frequently used in the phrase "Whingeing Pommy Bastard". The Oxford English dictionary mildly describes them as a 'derogatory terms' for (originally) British and (latterly) English immigrants. The singularly Australasian term Pom (or Pommie) was most often used from the 1960s onwards along with two other words 'whingeing' and 'bastard'. Who should decide really whether the Australasian terms 'Pom' and 'Pommie' are acceptable or not?Ĭlearly the English immigrants who have suffered it the most?
0 kommentar(er)
